28 research outputs found

    Bioinformatic flowchart and database to investigate the origins and diversity of Clan AA peptidases

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Clan AA of aspartic peptidases relates the family of pepsin monomers evolutionarily with all dimeric peptidases encoded by eukaryotic LTR retroelements. Recent findings describing various pools of single-domain nonviral host peptidases, in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, indicate that the diversity of clan AA is larger than previously thought. The ensuing approach to investigate this enzyme group is by studying its phylogeny. However, clan AA is a difficult case to study due to the low similarity and different rates of evolution. This work is an ongoing attempt to investigate the different clan AA families to understand the cause of their diversity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this paper, we describe in-progress database and bioinformatic flowchart designed to characterize the clan AA protein domain based on all possible protein families through ancestral reconstructions, sequence logos, and hidden markov models (HMMs). The flowchart includes the characterization of a major consensus sequence based on 6 amino acid patterns with correspondence with Andreeva's model, the structural template describing the clan AA peptidase fold. The set of tools is work in progress we have organized in a database within the GyDB project, referred to as Clan AA Reference Database <url>http://gydb.uv.es/gydb/phylogeny.php?tree=caard</url>.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The pre-existing classification combined with the evolutionary history of LTR retroelements permits a consistent taxonomical collection of sequence logos and HMMs. This set is useful for gene annotation but also a reference to evaluate the diversity of, and the relationships among, the different families. Comparisons among HMMs suggest a common ancestor for all dimeric clan AA peptidases that is halfway between single-domain nonviral peptidases and those coded by <it>Ty3/Gypsy </it>LTR retroelements. Sequence logos reveal how all clan AA families follow similar protein domain architecture related to the peptidase fold. In particular, each family nucleates a particular consensus motif in the sequence position related to the flap. The different motifs constitute a network where an alanine-asparagine-like variable motif predominates, instead of the canonical flap of the HIV-1 peptidase and closer relatives.</p> <p>Reviewers</p> <p>This article was reviewed by Daniel H. Haft, Vladimir Kapitonov (nominated by Jerry Jurka), and Ben M. Dunn (nominated by Claus Wilke).</p

    Client applications and server-side docker for management of RNASeq and/or VariantSeq workflows and pipelines of the GPRO suite

    Get PDF
    The GPRO suite is an in-progress bioinformatic project for -omics data analysis. As part of the continued growth of this project, we introduce a client- and server-side solution for comparative transcriptomics and analysis of variants. The client-side consists of two Java applications called “RNASeq” and “VariantSeq” to manage pipelines and workflows based on the most common command line interface tools for RNA-seq and Variant-seq analysis, respectively. As such, “RNASeq” and “VariantSeq” are coupled with a Linux server infrastructure (named GPRO Server-Side) that hosts all dependencies of each application (scripts, databases, and command line interface software). Implementation of the Server-Side requires a Linux operating system, PHP, SQL, Python, bash scripting, and third-party software. The GPRO Server-Side can be installed, via a Docker container, in the user’s PC under any operating system or on remote servers, as a cloud solution. “RNASeq” and “VariantSeq” are both available as desktop (RCP compilation) and web (RAP compilation) applications. Each application has two execution modes: a step-by-step mode enables each step of the workflow to be executed independently, and a pipeline mode allows all steps to be run sequentially. “RNASeq” and “VariantSeq” also feature an experimental, online support system called GENIE that consists of a virtual (chatbot) assistant and a pipeline jobs panel coupled with an expert system. The chatbot can troubleshoot issues with the usage of each tool, the pipeline jobs panel provides information about the status of each computational job executed in the GPRO Server-Side, while the expert system provides the user with a potential recommendation to identify or fix failed analyses. Our solution is a ready-to-use topic specific platform that combines the user-friendliness, robustness, and security of desktop software, with the efficiency of cloud/web applications to manage pipelines and workflows based on command line interface software.This work was supported by the Marie Sklodowska-Curie OPATHY project grant agreement 642095, the pre-doctoral research fellowship from MINECO Industrial Doctorates (Grant 659 DI-17-09134); Grant TSI-100903-2019-11 from the Secretary of State for Digital Advancement from Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation, Spain; the Expedient IDI-2021-158274-a from the Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain; and the ThinkInAzul program supported by MCIN with funding from European Union NextGenerationEU (PRTR-C17.I1) and Generalitat Valenciana (THINKINAZUL/2021/024).Peer Reviewed"Article signat per 18 autors/es: Ahmed Ibrahem Hafez, Beatriz Soriano, Aya Allah Elsayed,Ricardo Futami,Raquel Ceprian, Ricardo Ramos-Ruiz, Genis Martinez, Francisco Jose Roig, Miguel Angel Torres-Font, Fernando Naya-Catala, Josep Alvar Calduch-Giner, Lucia Trilla-Fuertes, Angelo Gamez Pozo, Vicente Arnau, Jose Maria Sempere-Luna, Jaume Perez-Sanchez, Toni Gabaldon and Carlos Llorens "Postprint (published version

    Simulating Multilevel Dynamics of Antimicrobial Resistance in a Membrane Computing Model

    Get PDF
    [EN] Membrane computing is a bio-inspired computing paradigm whose devices are the so-called membrane systems or P systems. The P system designed in this work reproduces complex biological landscapes in the computer world. It uses nested "membrane-surrounded entities" able to divide, propagate, and die; to be transferred into other membranes; to exchange informative material according to flexible rules; and to mutate and be selected by external agents. This allows the exploration of hierarchical interactive dynamics resulting from the probabilistic interaction of genes (phenotypes), clones, species, hosts, environments, and antibiotic challenges. Our model facilitates analysis of several aspects of the rules that govern the multilevel evolutionary biology of antibiotic resistance. We examined a number of selected landscapes where we predict the effects of different rates of patient flow from hospital to the community and vice versa, the cross-transmission rates between patients with bacterial propagules of different sizes, the proportion of patients treated with antibiotics, and the antibiotics and dosing found in the opening spaces in the microbiota where resistant phenotypes multiply. We also evaluated the selective strengths of some drugs and the influence of the time 0 resistance composition of the species and bacterial clones in the evolution of resistance phenotypes. In summary, we provide case studies analyzing the hierarchical dynamics of antibiotic resistance using a novel computing model with reciprocity within and between levels of biological organization, a type of approach that may be expanded in the multilevel analysis of complex microbial landscapes.This work was supported by the European Commission, Seven Framework Program (EVOTAR; FP7-HEALTH-282004) to F. Baquero, T. Coque, V. Fernandez-Lanza, and M. Campos; the Instituto de Salud Carlos III of Spain (Plan Estatal de I+D+i 2013-2016, grant PI15-00818 and FIS18-1942; CIBERESP, grant CB06/02/0053, and the EU Joint Programming Initiative JPIAMR2016-AC16/00036 to F. Baquero; the Regional Government of Madrid (InGEMICS-C; S2017/BMD-3691) to T. Coque and F. Baquero; and SAF2015-65878-R (MINECO, Spain) and PrometeoII/2014/065 (Generalitat Valenciana, Spain) to A. Moya (all cofinanced by the European Development Regional Fund [ERDF] "A Way to Achieve Europe").Campos Frances, M.; Capilla, R.; Naya, F.; Futami, R.; Coque, T.; Moya, A.; Fernández-Lanza, V.... (2019). Simulating Multilevel Dynamics of Antimicrobial Resistance in a Membrane Computing Model. mBio. 10(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02460-18117101Baquero, F. (2004). From pieces to patterns: evolutionary engineering in bacterial pathogens. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2(6), 510-518. doi:10.1038/nrmicro909Baquero, F., Tedim, A. P., & Coque, T. M. (2013). Antibiotic resistance shaping multi-level population biology of bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology, 4. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00015Cantón, R., & Ruiz-Garbajosa, P. (2011). Co-resistance: an opportunity for the bacteria and resistance genes. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 11(5), 477-485. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2011.07.007Baquero, F., & Coque, T. M. (2011). Multilevel population genetics in antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 35(5), 705-706. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00293.xGÜNTHER, F., & FOLKE, C. (1993). CHARACTERISTICS OF NESTED LIVING SYSTEMS. Journal of Biological Systems, 01(03), 257-274. doi:10.1142/s0218339093000173Păun, G. (2000). Computing with Membranes. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 61(1), 108-143. doi:10.1006/jcss.1999.16937. Frisco P, Gheorghe M, Pérez-Jiménez MJ. 2014. Applications of membrane computing to systems and synthetic biology. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.Campos, M., Llorens, C., Sempere, J. M., Futami, R., Rodriguez, I., Carrasco, P., … Baquero, F. (2015). A membrane computing simulator of trans-hierarchical antibiotic resistance evolution dynamics in nested ecological compartments (ARES). Biology Direct, 10(1). doi:10.1186/s13062-015-0070-9Baquero, F. (2017). Transmission as a basic process in microbial biology. Lwoff Award Prize Lecture. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 41(6), 816-827. doi:10.1093/femsre/fux042Baquero, F., Coque, T. M., & de la Cruz, F. (2011). Ecology and Evolution as Targets: the Need for Novel Eco-Evo Drugs and Strategies To Fight Antibiotic Resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 55(8), 3649-3660. doi:10.1128/aac.00013-11Baquero, F., & Martínez, J.-L. (2017). Interventions on Metabolism: Making Antibiotic-Susceptible Bacteria. mBio, 8(6). doi:10.1128/mbio.01950-17Fondi, M., Karkman, A., Tamminen, M. V., Bosi, E., Virta, M., Fani, R., … McInerney, J. O. (2016). «Every Gene Is Everywhere but the Environment Selects»: Global Geolocalization of Gene Sharing in Environmental Samples through Network Analysis. Genome Biology and Evolution, 8(5), 1388-1400. doi:10.1093/gbe/evw077Smillie, C. S., Smith, M. B., Friedman, J., Cordero, O. X., David, L. A., & Alm, E. J. (2011). Ecology drives a global network of gene exchange connecting the human microbiome. Nature, 480(7376), 241-244. doi:10.1038/nature10571Fuzi, M. (2016). Dissimilar Fitness Associated with Resistance to Fluoroquinolones Influences Clonal Dynamics of Various Multiresistant Bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01017Fuzi, M., Szabo, D., & Csercsik, R. (2017). Double-Serine Fluoroquinolone Resistance Mutations Advance Major International Clones and Lineages of Various Multi-Drug Resistant Bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02261Lipsitch, M., Bergstrom, C. T., & Levin, B. R. (2000). The epidemiology of antibiotic resistance in hospitals: Paradoxes and prescriptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(4), 1938-1943. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.4.1938Lehtinen, S., Blanquart, F., Croucher, N. J., Turner, P., Lipsitch, M., & Fraser, C. (2017). Evolution of antibiotic resistance is linked to any genetic mechanism affecting bacterial duration of carriage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(5), 1075-1080. doi:10.1073/pnas.1617849114Lanza, V. F., Baquero, F., Martínez, J. L., Ramos-Ruíz, R., González-Zorn, B., Andremont, A., … Coque, T. M. (2018). In-depth resistome analysis by targeted metagenomics. Microbiome, 6(1). doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0387-yWoolhouse, M. (2019). Quantifying Transmission. Microbial Transmission, 281-289. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.mtbp-0005-2016Del Campo, R., Sánchez‐Díaz, A. M., Zamora, J., Torres, C., Cintas, L. M., Franco, E., … Baquero, F. (2014). Individual variability in finger‐to‐finger transmission efficiency of Enterococcus faecium clones. MicrobiologyOpen, 3(1), 128-132. doi:10.1002/mbo3.156Faith, J. J., Colombel, J.-F., & Gordon, J. I. (2015). Identifying strains that contribute to complex diseases through the study of microbial inheritance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(3), 633-640. doi:10.1073/pnas.1418781112Bik, E. M., Eckburg, P. B., Gill, S. R., Nelson, K. E., Purdom, E. A., Francois, F., … Relman, D. A. (2006). Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiota in the human stomach. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(3), 732-737. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506655103Huijben, S., Bell, A. S., Sim, D. G., Tomasello, D., Mideo, N., Day, T., & Read, A. F. (2013). Aggressive Chemotherapy and the Selection of Drug Resistant Pathogens. PLoS Pathogens, 9(9), e1003578. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003578Day, T., & Read, A. F. (2016). Does High-Dose Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Prevent the Evolution of Resistance? PLOS Computational Biology, 12(1), e1004689. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004689Kouyos, R. D., Metcalf, C. J. E., Birger, R., Klein, E. Y., Abel zur Wiesch, P., Ankomah, P., … Grenfell, B. (2014). The path of least resistance: aggressive or moderate treatment? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1794), 20140566. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0566Kouyos, R. D., Abel zur Wiesch, P., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2011). On Being the Right Size: The Impact of Population Size and Stochastic Effects on the Evolution of Drug Resistance in Hospitals and the Community. PLoS Pathogens, 7(4), e1001334. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001334Oz, T., Guvenek, A., Yildiz, S., Karaboga, E., Tamer, Y. T., Mumcuyan, N., … Toprak, E. (2014). Strength of Selection Pressure Is an Important Parameter Contributing to the Complexity of Antibiotic Resistance Evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31(9), 2387-2401. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu191Martínez, J. L., & Baquero, F. (2014). Emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance: setting a parameter space. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 119(2), 68-77. doi:10.3109/03009734.2014.901444Baym, M., Lieberman, T. D., Kelsic, E. D., Chait, R., Gross, R., Yelin, I., & Kishony, R. (2016). Spatiotemporal microbial evolution on antibiotic landscapes. Science, 353(6304), 1147-1151. doi:10.1126/science.aag0822Hermsen, R., & Hwa, T. (2010). Sources and Sinks: A Stochastic Model of Evolution in Heterogeneous Environments. Physical Review Letters, 105(24). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.24810431. Coen P. 2012. Models of hospital acquired infection, p 39–64. In Sudhakar C. (ed) Infection control—updates. InTech Publishers, London, United Kingdom.32. Chow SJ. 2011. Heuristics, concepts, and cognitive architecture: toward understanding how the mind works. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository, 128. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/128.Levin, B. R., Baquero, F., Ankomah, P. (Pierre), & McCall, I. C. (2017). Phagocytes, Antibiotics, and Self-Limiting Bacterial Infections. Trends in Microbiology, 25(11), 878-892. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.07.005Schmidt, G. V., Mellerup, A., Christiansen, L. E., Ståhl, M., Olsen, J. E., & Angen, Ø. (2015). Sampling and Pooling Methods for Capturing Herd Level Antibiotic Resistance in Swine Feces using qPCR and CFU Approaches. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0131672. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131672Browne, H. P., Neville, B. A., Forster, S. C., & Lawley, T. D. (2017). Transmission of the gut microbiota: spreading of health. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 15(9), 531-543. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.50DALLANTONIA, M., COEN, P., WILKS, M., WHILEY, A., & MILLAR, M. (2005). Competition between methicillin-sensitive and -resistant in the anterior nares. Journal of Hospital Infection, 61(1), 62-67. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2005.01.008Austin, D. J., & Anderson, R. M. (1999). Transmission Dynamics of Epidemic Methicillin‐ResistantStaphylococcus aureusand Vancomycin‐Resistant Enterococci in England and Wales. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 179(4), 883-891. doi:10.1086/314682Gerrish, P. J., & Lenski, R. E. (1998). Genetica, 102/103, 127-144. doi:10.1023/a:1017067816551Austin, D. J., & Anderson, R. M. (1999). Studies of antibiotic resistance within the patient, hospitals and the community using simple mathematical models. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 354(1384), 721-738. doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0425Webb, G. F., D’Agata, E. M. C., Magal, P., & Ruan, S. (2005). A model of antibiotic-resistant bacterial epidemics in hospitals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(37), 13343-13348. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504053102D’Agata, E. M. C., Magal, P., Olivier, D., Ruan, S., & Webb, G. F. (2007). Modeling antibiotic resistance in hospitals: The impact of minimizing treatment duration. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 249(3), 487-499. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.08.011D’Agata, E. M. C., Dupont-Rouzeyrol, M., Magal, P., Olivier, D., & Ruan, S. (2008). The Impact of Different Antibiotic Regimens on the Emergence of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria. PLoS ONE, 3(12), e4036. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004036Haber, M., Levin, B. R., & Kramarz, P. (2010). Antibiotic control of antibiotic resistance in hospitals: a simulation study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 10(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-254Bonhoeffer, S., Lipsitch, M., & Levin, B. R. (1997). Evaluating treatment protocols to prevent antibiotic resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(22), 12106-12111. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.22.12106Bonten, M. J. M., Austin, D. J., & Lipsitch, M. (2001). Understanding the Spread of Antibiotic Resistant Pathogens in Hospitals: Mathematical Models as Tools for Control. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 33(10), 1739-1746. doi:10.1086/323761Mullineaux-Sanders, C., Suez, J., Elinav, E., & Frankel, G. (2018). Sieving through gut models of colonization resistance. Nature Microbiology, 3(2), 132-140. doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0095-1Spicknall, I. H., Foxman, B., Marrs, C. F., & Eisenberg, J. N. S. (2013). A Modeling Framework for the Evolution and Spread of Antibiotic Resistance: Literature Review and Model Categorization. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178(4), 508-520. doi:10.1093/aje/kwt017Llop, P., Latorre, A., & Moya, A. (2019). Experimental Epidemiology of Antibiotic Resistance: Looking for an Appropriate Animal Model System. Microbial Transmission, 291-309. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.mtbp-0007-2016Colomer, M. À., Margalida, A., Sanuy, D., & Pérez-Jiménez, M. J. (2011). A bio-inspired computing model as a new tool for modeling ecosystems: The avian scavengers as a case study. Ecological Modelling, 222(1), 33-47. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.012Romero-Campero, F. J., & Pérez-Jiménez, M. J. (2008). A Model of the Quorum Sensing System in Vibrio fischeri Using P Systems. Artificial Life, 14(1), 95-109. doi:10.1162/artl.2008.14.1.95Romero-Campero, F. J., & Pérez-Jiménez, M. J. (2008). Modelling gene expression control using P systems: The Lac Operon, a case study. Biosystems, 91(3), 438-457. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2007.02.011Bootsma, M., Bonten, M., Nijssen, S., Fluit, A., & Diekmann, O. (2007). An Algorithm to Estimate the Importance of Bacterial Acquisition Routes in Hospital Settings. American Journal of Epidemiology, 166(7), 841-851. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm149Wingard, E., Shlaes, J. H., Mortimer, E. A., & Shlaes, D. M. (1993). Colonization and Cross-Colonization of Nursing Home Patients with Trimethoprim-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 16(1), 75-81. doi:10.1093/clinids/16.1.7

    Client applications and Server Side docker for management of RNASeq and/or VariantSeq workflows and pipelines of the GPRO Suite

    Get PDF
    The GPRO suite is an in-progress bioinformatic project for -omic data analyses. As part of the continued growth of this project, we introduce a client side & server side solution for comparative transcriptomics and analysis of variants. The client side consists of two Java applications called "RNASeq" and "VariantSeq" to manage workflows for RNA-seq and Variant-seq analysis, respectively, based on the most common command line interface tools for each topic. Both applications are coupled with a Linux server infrastructure (named GPRO Server Side) that hosts all dependencies of each application (scripts, databases, and command line interface tools). Implementation of the server side requires a Linux operating system, PHP, SQL, Python, bash scripting, and third-party software. The GPRO Server Side can be deployed via a Docker container that can be installed in the user's PC using any operating system or on remote servers as a cloud solution. The two applications are available as desktop and cloud applications and provide two execution modes: a Step-by-Step mode enables each step of a workflow to be executed independently and a Pipeline mode allows all steps to be run sequentially. The two applications also feature an experimental support system called GENIE that consists of a virtual chatbot/assistant and a pipeline jobs panel coupled with an expert system. The chatbot can troubleshoot issues with the usage of each tool, the pipeline job panel provides information about the status of each task executed in the GPRO Server Side, and the expert provides the user with a potential recommendation to identify or fix failed analyses. The two applications and the GPRO Server Side combine the user-friendliness and security of client software with the efficiency of front-end & back-end solutions to manage command line interface software for RNA-seq and variant-seq analysis via interface environments

    Client Applications and Server-Side Docker for Management of RNASeq and/or VariantSeq Workflows and Pipelines of the GPRO Suite

    Get PDF
    The GPRO suite is an in-progress bioinformatic project for -omics data analysis. As part of the continued growth of this project, we introduce a client- and server-side solution for comparative transcriptomics and analysis of variants. The client-side consists of two Java applications called 'RNASeq' and 'VariantSeq' to manage pipelines and workflows based on the most common command line interface tools for RNA-seq and Variant-seq analysis, respectively. As such, 'RNASeq' and 'VariantSeq' are coupled with a Linux server infrastructure (named GPRO Server-Side) that hosts all dependencies of each application (scripts, databases, and command line interface software). Implementation of the Server-Side requires a Linux operating system, PHP, SQL, Python, bash scripting, and third-party software. The GPRO Server-Side can be installed, via a Docker container, in the user's PC under any operating system or on remote servers, as a cloud solution. 'RNASeq' and 'VariantSeq' are both available as desktop (RCP compilation) and web (RAP compilation) applications. Each application has two execution modes: a step-by-step mode enables each step of the workflow to be executed independently, and a pipeline mode allows all steps to be run sequentially. 'RNASeq' and 'VariantSeq' also feature an experimental, online support system called GENIE that consists of a virtual (chatbot) assistant and a pipeline jobs panel coupled with an expert system. The chatbot can troubleshoot issues with the usage of each tool, the pipeline jobs panel provides information about the status of each computational job executed in the GPRO Server-Side, while the expert system provides the user with a potential recommendation to identify or fix failed analyses. Our solution is a ready-to-use topic specific platform that combines the user-friendliness, robustness, and security of desktop software, with the efficiency of cloud/web applications to manage pipelines and workflows based on command line interface software

    Hyperoxemia and excess oxygen use in early acute respiratory distress syndrome : Insights from the LUNG SAFE study

    Get PDF
    Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.Background: Concerns exist regarding the prevalence and impact of unnecessary oxygen use in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We examined this issue in patients with ARDS enrolled in the Large observational study to UNderstand the Global impact of Severe Acute respiratory FailurE (LUNG SAFE) study. Methods: In this secondary analysis of the LUNG SAFE study, we wished to determine the prevalence and the outcomes associated with hyperoxemia on day 1, sustained hyperoxemia, and excessive oxygen use in patients with early ARDS. Patients who fulfilled criteria of ARDS on day 1 and day 2 of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were categorized based on the presence of hyperoxemia (PaO2 > 100 mmHg) on day 1, sustained (i.e., present on day 1 and day 2) hyperoxemia, or excessive oxygen use (FIO2 ≥ 0.60 during hyperoxemia). Results: Of 2005 patients that met the inclusion criteria, 131 (6.5%) were hypoxemic (PaO2 < 55 mmHg), 607 (30%) had hyperoxemia on day 1, and 250 (12%) had sustained hyperoxemia. Excess FIO2 use occurred in 400 (66%) out of 607 patients with hyperoxemia. Excess FIO2 use decreased from day 1 to day 2 of ARDS, with most hyperoxemic patients on day 2 receiving relatively low FIO2. Multivariate analyses found no independent relationship between day 1 hyperoxemia, sustained hyperoxemia, or excess FIO2 use and adverse clinical outcomes. Mortality was 42% in patients with excess FIO2 use, compared to 39% in a propensity-matched sample of normoxemic (PaO2 55-100 mmHg) patients (P = 0.47). Conclusions: Hyperoxemia and excess oxygen use are both prevalent in early ARDS but are most often non-sustained. No relationship was found between hyperoxemia or excessive oxygen use and patient outcome in this cohort. Trial registration: LUNG-SAFE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02010073publishersversionPeer reviewe

    A membrane computing simulator of trans-hierarchical antibiotic resistance evolution dynamics in nested ecological compartments (ARES)

    Get PDF
    In this article, we introduce ARES (Antibiotic Resistance Evolution Simulator) a software device that simulates P-system model scenarios with five types of nested computing membranes oriented to emulate a hierarchy of eco-biological compartments, i.e. a) peripheral ecosystem; b) local environment; c) reservoir of supplies; d) animal host; and e) host's associated bacterial organisms (microbiome). Computational objects emulating molecular entities such as plasmids, antibiotic resistance genes, antimicrobials, and/or other substances can be introduced into this framework and may interact and evolve together with the membranes, according to a set of pre-established rules and specifications. ARES has been implemented as an online server and offers additional tools for storage and model editing and downstream analysisThis work has also been supported by grants BFU2012-39816-C02-01 (co-financed by FEDER funds and the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spain) to AL and Prometeo/2009/092 (Ministry of Education, Government of Valencia, Spain) and Explora Ciencia y Explora Tecnologia/SAF2013-49788-EXP (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) to AM. IRF is recipient of a "Sara Borrell" postdoctoral fellowship (Ref. CD12/00492) from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain). We are also grateful to the Spanish Network for the Study of Plasmids and Extrachromosomal Elements (REDEEX) for encouraging and funding cooperation among Spanish microbiologists working on the biology of mobile genetic elements (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, reference number BFU2011-14145-E).Campos Frances, M.; Llorens, C.; Sempere Luna, JM.; Futami, R.; Rodríguez, I.; Carrasco, P.; Capilla, R.... (2015). A membrane computing simulator of trans-hierarchical antibiotic resistance evolution dynamics in nested ecological compartments (ARES). Biology Direct. 10(41):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-015-0070-9S1131041Baquero F, Coque TM, Canton R. Counteracting antibiotic resistance: breaking barriers among antibacterial strategies. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2014;18:851–61.Baquero F, Lanza VF, Canton R, Coque TM. Public health evolutionary biology of antimicrobial resistance: priorities for intervention. Evol Appl. 2014;8:223–39.Baquero F, Coque TM, de la Cruz F. Ecology and evolution as targets: the need for novel eco-evo drugs and strategies to fight antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:3649–60.Carlet J, Jarlier V, Harbarth S, Voss A, Goossens H, Pittet D, et al. Ready for a world without antibiotics? The pensieres antibiotic resistance call to action. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2012;1:11.Laxminarayan R, Duse A, Wattal C, Zaidi AK, Wertheim HF, Sumpradit N, et al. Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:1057–98.G8-Science-Ministers-Statement. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g8-science-ministers-statement .Levy SB, Marshall B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nat Med. 2004;10:S122–9.Wellington EM, Boxall AB, Cross P, Feil EJ, Gaze WH, Hawkey PM, et al. The role of the natural environment in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:155–65.Marshall BM, Levy SB. Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:718–33.Marshall BM, Ochieng DJ, Levy SB. Commensals: underappreciated reservoir of antibiotic resistance. Microbe. 2009;4:231–8.Forsberg KJ, Reyes A, Wang B, Selleck EM, Sommer MO, Dantas G. The shared antibiotic resistome of soil bacteria and human pathogens. Science. 2012;337:1107–11.Heuer H, Schmitt H, Smalla K. Antibiotic resistance gene spread due to manure application on agricultural fields. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14:236–43.Teillant A, Laxminarayan R. Economics of Antibiotic Use in U.S. Swine and Poultry Production. Choices. 2015;30:1. 1st Quarter 2015.ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE THREATS in the United States. http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf .Gillings MR. Evolutionary consequences of antibiotic use for the resistome, mobilome and microbial pangenome. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:4.Davies J, Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74:417–33.Palmer AC, Kishony R. Understanding, predicting and manipulating the genotypic evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:243–8.Baquero F, Tedim AP, Coque TM. Antibiotic resistance shaping multi-level population biology of bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:15.Partridge SR. Analysis of antibiotic resistance regions in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35:820–55.Baquero F, Coque TM. Multilevel population genetics in antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35:705–6.Martinez JL, Baquero F, Andersson DI. Predicting antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:958–65.Martinez JL, Baquero F. Emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance: setting a parameter space. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. Upsala J Med Sci. 2014, Early Online: 1–10, doi: 10.3109/03009734.2014.901444 ).Baquero F, Nombela C. The microbiome as a human organ. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18 Suppl 4:2–4.Kumsa B, Socolovschi C, Parola P, Rolain JM, Raoult D. Molecular detection of Acinetobacter species in lice and keds of domestic animals in Oromia Regional State. Ethiopia PLoS One. 2012;7:e52377.Ahmad A, Ghosh A, Schal C, Zurek L. Insects in confined swine operations carry a large antibiotic resistant and potentially virulent enterococcal community. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:23.Graczyk TK, Knight R, Gilman RH, Cranfield MR. The role of non-biting flies in the epidemiology of human infectious diseases. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:231–5.Limoee M, Enayati AA, Khassi K, Salimi M, Ladonni H. Insecticide resistance and synergism of three field-collected strains of the German cockroach Blattella germanica (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae) from hospitals in Kermanshah, Iran. Trop Biomed. 2011;28:111–8.Salehzadeha A, Tavacolb P, Mahjubc H. Bacterial, fungal and parasitic contamination of cockroaches in public hospitals of Hamadan, Iran. J Vect Borne Dis. 2007;44:105–10.Akinjogunla OJ, Odeyemi AT, Udoinyang EP. Cockroaches (periplaneta americana and blattella germanica): reservoirs of multi drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State. Scientific J Biol Sci. 2012;1:19–30.Mideo N, Alizon S, Day T. Linking within- and between-host dynamics in the evolutionary epidemiology of infectious diseases. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23:511–7.Gillings MR, Stokes HW. Are humans increasing bacterial evolvability? Trends EcolEvol. 2012;27:346–52.Baquero F. Environmental stress and evolvability in microbial systems. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15 Suppl 1:5–10.Paun G, Rozemberg G, Salomaa A. The Oxford Handbook of Membrane Computing. Oxford, London. Oxford University Press. 2010.Paun G. Membrane Computing. An Introduction. Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag GmbH. 2002.Paun G. Computing with membranes. J Comput Syst Sci. 2000;61:108–43.Fontana F, Biancom L, Manca V. P systems and the modeling of biochemical oscillations. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2006;3850:199–208.Cheruku S, Paun A, Romero-Campero FJ, Perez-Jimenez MJ, Ibarra OH. Simulating FAS-induced apoptosis by using P systems. Prog Nat Sci. 2007;4:424–31.Perez-Jimenez MJ, Romero-Campero FJ. P systems, a new computational modelling tool for systems biology. Transactions on computational systems. Lect N Bioinformat. 2006;Biology VI:176–97.Romero-Campero FJ, Perez-Jimenez MJ. Modelling gene expression control using P systems: The Lac Operon, a case study. Biosystems. 2008;91:438–57.Romero-Campero FJ, Perez-Jimenez MJ. A model of the quorum sensing system in Vibrio fischeri using P systems. Artif Life. 2008;14:95–109.Besozzi D, Cazzaniga P, Pescini D, Mauri G. Modelling metapopulations with stochastic membrane systems. Biosystems. 2008;91:499–514.Cardona M, Colomer MA, Perez-Jimenez MJ, Sanuy D, Margalida A. Modelling ecosystems using P Systems: The Bearded Vulture, a case of study. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2009;5391:137–56.Cardona M, Colomer MA, Margalida A, Perez-Hurtado I, Perez-Jimenez MJ, Sanuy D. A P system based model of an ecosystem of some scavenger birds. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2010;5957:182–95.Frisco P, Gheorghe M, Perez-Jimenez M. Applications of Membrane Computing in Systems and Synthetic biology. Cham. Springer International Publishing. 2014.Membrane Computing Community. http://ppage.psystems.eu .P-Lingua. http://www.p-lingua.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page .Llorens C, Futami R, Covelli L, Dominguez-Escriba L, Viu JM, Tamarit D, et al. The Gypsy Database (GyDB) of mobile genetic elements: release 2.0. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D70–4.Baquero F. From pieces to patterns: evolutionary engineering in bacterial pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:510–8.Java. http://www.java.com .Garcia-Quismondo M, Gutierrez-Escudero R, Martinez-del-Amor MA, Orejuela-Pinedo E, Pérez-Hurtado I. P-Lingua 2.0: a software framework for cell-like P systems. Int J Comput Commun. 2009;IV:234.R programming language. http://www.r-project.org .Maciel A, Sankaranarayanan G, Halic T, Arikatla VS, Lu Z, De S. Surgical model-view-controller simulation software framework for local and collaborative applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2011;6:457–71.Dethlefsen L, McFall-Ngai M, Relman DA. An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human-microbe mutualism and disease. Nature. 2007;449:811–8.Ley RE, Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Knight R, Gordon JI. Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:776–88.Pallen MJ, Wren BW. Bacterial pathogenomics. Nature. 2007;449:835–42.Carrasco P, Perez-Cobas AE, Van de Pol C, Baixeras J, Moya A, Latorre A. Succession of the gut microbiota in the cockroach Blattella germanica. Int Microbiol. 2014;17:99–109

    GyDB mobilomics: LTR retroelements and integrase-related transposons of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum genome

    No full text
    The Gypsy Database concerning Mobile Genetic Elements (release 2.0) is a wiki-style project devoted to the phylogenetic classification of LTR retroelements and their viral and host gene relatives characterized from distinct organisms. Furthermore, GyDB 2.0 is concerned with studying mobile elements within genomes. Therefore, an in-progress repository was created for databases with annotations of mobile genetic elements from particular genomes. This repository is called Mobilomics and the first uploaded database contains 549 LTR retroelements and related transposases which have been annotated from the genome of the Pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Mobilomics is accessible from the GyDB 2.0 project using the URL: http://gydb.org/index.php/Mobilomics
    corecore